70 billion fron Iraq Afghanistan but no money for child health care?

August 21st, 2005 | by Michael |
child health
baconandtoast22 asked:


wow perch? ? this goin on. Why? ascending and nobody will say something wow if don 't want to help sick kids then you have a problem concerning the non-l? ppor that are failing and should not be punished for something does not have control over.

  1. 6 Responses to “70 billion fron Iraq Afghanistan but no money for child health care?”

  2. By Joseph, II on Aug 21, 2005 | Reply

    Welcome to the Bush Administration! -Where there’s ALWAYS lots of money for War, -but precious little for Our Children, Seniors- or Working People… :(

  3. By okrife on Aug 21, 2005 | Reply

    Well you people keep right on voting for both those parties candidates.
    VOTE LIBERTARIAN!!!!

  4. By Cobby/ink freak/Ink artist on Aug 23, 2005 | Reply

    Yep the bums are blowing our social security. We need to throw them out of that North Eastern Palace.

  5. By giginotgigi on Aug 26, 2005 | Reply

    Refering to the yahoo news yesterday, it was a political deal. Senate approved that funding and Bush would release some other benefit to public.

    Anyway, if U.S. soldiers cannot clean up Ladden and his followers, U.S. child would have to be muslim or even ******* bombers eventually.

  6. By elevated10 on Aug 29, 2005 | Reply

    He didnt sign the childrens healthcare bills because they didnt help POOR children. I wouldnt have signed them either.

  7. By Tomsriv on Aug 30, 2005 | Reply

    It would have helped a lot of lower middle class families. Right now if you make less than 70k a year and live in the city you are probably not a homeowner and have little savings. SCHIP would have covered these people who are far above poverty, but below middle class. Its a shame that Republicans destroy Unions which provide health care, then they take away government help for working Americans.

Post a Comment