Why can’t we afford the money for the state’s children health care?
May 8th, 2009 | by Michael |
MJ 32001 asked:
I heard on TV that Bush was set to use his fourth veto in this State 'laws of health of children s. something in that too many people of the central class would take the advantage and something like it had too much money to spend on such a draw. My thing is if we can spend the amount we 're nell'Irak costs (due to their health in spite of this), then why can' t find the money for ourselves and our children (they 're still the future, the right ?). There is something wrong with this ideology. Do not ever seem to have enough money to take care of our unfortunate, but we can spend hundreds of billions (before this war, I never knew that such a tab may exist) to stabilize a region. This is an issue not partisan, but American. I feel like this is the last straw. I want to support our troops, when it seems my own government doesn 't support it. I need some thoughts (PLEASE friendly as always!) On this. I 'd love to hear from "conservatives" about this. But sharon, isn 't the fact that everything has increased in cost in the last decade to include a factor. Why anyone would think that our government isn 't able to control our health care system. Private industry clearly isn 't, that is because they are (exponentially) increase continuously and complaints are increasingly neganda. Jeff, Maybe so, but my issue is with how the United States decide how to spend our money. This should be a clearing, cut edition. Health care for eveyone is a good thing, isn 't it? The private sector doesn 't seem concerned regarding insurance of all Americans, so why shouldn' t the government? I think there is too much trust in the private sector to correct the ills of society. Everything seems to want to profit from outside the U.S., but nobody wants to trust the U.S. gov 't. This is a rather shocked me.
ABEL
I heard on TV that Bush was set to use his fourth veto in this State 'laws of health of children s. something in that too many people of the central class would take the advantage and something like it had too much money to spend on such a draw. My thing is if we can spend the amount we 're nell'Irak costs (due to their health in spite of this), then why can' t find the money for ourselves and our children (they 're still the future, the right ?). There is something wrong with this ideology. Do not ever seem to have enough money to take care of our unfortunate, but we can spend hundreds of billions (before this war, I never knew that such a tab may exist) to stabilize a region. This is an issue not partisan, but American. I feel like this is the last straw. I want to support our troops, when it seems my own government doesn 't support it. I need some thoughts (PLEASE friendly as always!) On this. I 'd love to hear from "conservatives" about this. But sharon, isn 't the fact that everything has increased in cost in the last decade to include a factor. Why anyone would think that our government isn 't able to control our health care system. Private industry clearly isn 't, that is because they are (exponentially) increase continuously and complaints are increasingly neganda. Jeff, Maybe so, but my issue is with how the United States decide how to spend our money. This should be a clearing, cut edition. Health care for eveyone is a good thing, isn 't it? The private sector doesn 't seem concerned regarding insurance of all Americans, so why shouldn' t the government? I think there is too much trust in the private sector to correct the ills of society. Everything seems to want to profit from outside the U.S., but nobody wants to trust the U.S. gov 't. This is a rather shocked me.
ABEL
Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.